Latest teaching jobs:

Google

Buy the EFL Teachers' Guide to Russia online! Instant download. Support VisaRus!New!
Download the entire VisaRus School Directory!New!

Viewing topic: Language Studio: second English school to be penalized for directory abuse

Forum Index » Saint Petersburg Schools & Work

Forum status: read-only (request forum permissions)
bobs12 User is offline

Saint Petersburg
Crusty Tech Support Veteran
Posts: 914
 Language Studio: second English school to be penalized for directory abuse  16th Nov '07 6:44 PM

Language Studio's Academic Director Paul Evans recently registered on VisaRus using a false name in a deliberate attempt to abuse the school rating system.

The review, posted under the username 'DaveR' (aka Paul Evans using the fake name 'Dave Ritchie') can be seen on the Language Studio page in the school directory. It was posted as a direct response to a below-average review by long-term VisaRus member Rosa101 (also available on the same page).

When challenged, Mr Evans remained unrepentant and attempted to justify his actions.

In light of Language Studio's past support of VisaRus, a compromise was offered - a full and unreserved apology from Mr. Evans in return for allowing future positive reviews to be posted, and two non-qualifying reviews to be removed (new Terms of Use state that if schools abuse the review system, future reviews may be zeroed and negative reviews will not be moderated).

Mr Evans' fairly incomprehensible response was as follows:

Hi there

I am assuming you did not get my reply email to you back sometime ago and sadly it has been deleted now from my sent folders.

You forwarded a message just after I registered and were asking why I was going to use the site.

In general it was to make a point.

My name is Paul Evans and I left my email address as it is because I wanted to make sure you knew how to contact me. I am now the Academic Director at Language Studio and I read one of the ratings of the school by someone, I do not know whom.

It mentioned all sorts of things that there is no way a teacher would know, and it also mentions things that are not relevant to our institution, but it does drop the SECOND LARGEST card that can be used in my country, America or in fact I think Britain. It is the Gender card, of Sexual Harrasment. Easy to play and by the email by "ROSA" it is a case of throw as much at the wall as possible and see what sticks and almost always that one will stick. The first of course in America and Canada is the Race card.

Sadly both of these do exist, but they are played far to often and without merit, and it does make it less credible when it is done over and over.

I was trying to make the point that anyone can post here and that it needs to have some fairness. I sadly do not know the criteria to use or how to make it work, I wish I had those answers, but you do run a mostly fair site, and from the people I have spoken to they think it is a good site for references and such.

But then I read yet another review, written by someone who is not only not a staff member but knows nothing of us first hand. And it is still posted. Also, he tells of a teacher beiing hounded because we have "SOOO MUCH WORK". Sorry but it seems that he may be getting calls to go to work and does'nt want to say NO! I am still trying to figure that out.

The latest I note is a direct attack on a staff member and it is totally unfair. Posh arrogant and self-satisfied.. are personal and not about the school. and when he does get around to the school it is more of the same.

I am sorry but this is not only unfair, but it seems the school is being targeted and I beleive I know by whom, and while I like the idea of the posting and the ratings.. it is too easy to do damage to a schools reputation simply by posting anonomously..

I apologise for the misleading statements (sorry not misleading, I actually do enjoy working at Lanaguage Studio} and I do enjoy the MANY happy teachers we have both Russian and Native speaking..

But I am sorry, I was angry enough by the post by Rosa that I allowed my emotions to get the better of me.


The above email contains many points that would be most diplomatically described as 'utterly inaccurate'.


1. Mr Evans made no attempt to communicate his intention when signing up, nor did I ask him. He signed up at 16:55:58, using the name 'Dave Ritche' and stating as his reason for signing up 'Learn about schools', and at 17:03:20 left his review of Language Studio (just over seven minutes later - that's incredibly fast, considering that you have to receive an email, click a link to activate your account, return to the site, log in, find the right page, type the review - all at the same time as allegedly writing to explain why you want to use the site...)

2. Mr Evans was already DoS at the time that he left the 'review'.

3. If the reason for signing up under a false name was "to make the point" that my system was open to abuse, why would he have tried to contact me and tell me what he was going to do, or use his personal email so that I 'knew how to contact him'? In actual fact, he has only proven that I am, in fact, able to keep the system fairly well protected from abuse. It's idiot-proof.

I was trying to make the point that anyone can post here and that it needs to have some fairness. I sadly do not know the criteria to use or how to make it work, I wish I had those answers, but you do run a mostly fair site, and from the people I have spoken to they think it is a good site for references and such.

It is fair precisely because anyone can post there, and because schools cannot have genuine reviews removed.

4. Discrimination issues are of no relevance to the matter in hand. In any case, the original review by Rosa101 did not imply that Mr Evans was involved in any form of discrimination.

5. Clearly Mr Evans did not read or did not understand the post by mememe (regarding looooads of work), which has since been disabled as it was not a direct account of working in the school. It referred to a teacher who had been invited to interview at Language Studio at a specific time and arrived to find that the person he was supposed to meet was not expected to be in the office all day, NOT a teacher who was overworked.

Mr Evans has successfully proven the point that my system IS unfair and open to abuse if I don't moderate it and delete reviews from idiots that have no business teaching English in the first place, or delete malicious reviews that aim to damage a school's reputation.

He has also proven the point that I am able to moderate the system and keep it clean by validating reviews. This process is time-consuming and costs money, which is why I will no longer be providing moderation for schools that have abused the system. Mr Evans was the first school representative to abuse the system in this manner.

In a telephone conversation subsequent to receiving the above email from Mr Evans, it was clear to me that he was entirely unrepentant and still felt justified in his actions.

A second attempt at apologising by Mr Evans was slightly closer to the mark:

Dear Robert

I appear to have been caught with my hand in the cookie jar by posting an anonymous message praising my own employer.

I recognize that this was a blatant attempt to manipulate the school's rating on your site. I apologize unreservedly both to you as the owner of the site and to the readers of this site.

I stand by my comments in the review in terms of genuinely enjoying my work and believing that Language School is a good place to work. I recognize that my irritation at a review that I believed was unprofessional, immature and unsubstantiated, was in no way an excuse for me to place this review.

Language Studio recognizes that where there are a lot of people working together, there is always the potential for conflict and misunderstanding, and welcomes all comments from teachers. Where a teacher feels they cannot discuss an issue with myself, they are encouraged to discuss it, in confidence, directly with the General Manager.

Once again, my full apologies to everyone concerned.

Sincerely,


Paul Evans
Academic Director
Language Studio

But nonetheless unacceptable due to the sarcastic opening tone (I appear to have been caught with my hand in the cookie jar...), the continued justification of his actions (I stand by my comments...) and his unjustified personal attack on the teacher who posted the original below-average review, and incidentally was genuinely upset by Mr Evans' conduct in the first place (my irritation at a review that I believed was unprofessional, immature and unsubstantiated...).

I would like to point out that Mr Wilson-Fish, senior director of Language Studio, took the matter seriously, cooperated fully in investigating matters relating to Mr Evans and also took the initiative of apologising on Mr Evans' behalf.

I am satisfied with Mr Wilson-Fish's assurances that no other members of staff were involved in Mr Evans' attempt at abusing the directory.

The following is the official apology that was accepted for publication on the Language Studio page in the school directory:

Dear Robert,



Language Studio’s Academic Director anonymously placed a review on your website praising the school, in an attempt to manipulate the ratings.



This action was taken without the knowledge or co-operation of any member of the management team. Language Studio would like to apologise for this action unreservedly. As the senior manager of Language Studio, I would like to state that I believe that this action was wholly unjustified and in no way represents the official view of Language Studio.



Language Studio genuinely believes that it’s people are it’s business. If any teacher, either current or former, feels that they have an issue with anyone that works at Language Studio, I would urge them to speak to the person concerned, and if they feel that it is not an issue that can be discussed with that person, then to contact myself directly. Any issue brought to myself will be investigated seriously and discussed in confidence.



I am aware how much work has been put into this website and how seriously it is taken as a resource by teachers. Language Studio fully supports the aims of this site. So, once again, my full apologies both to you and to the readers of the site.

Regards



James Wilson-Fish
Executive Director
Language Studio
www.LanStudio.ru
Tel: +7 812 347 7779
Fax: +7 812 495 6725


I am fully aware that there are most likely very many happy teachers at Language Studio, just as I do not doubt that the number of happy teachers may well outnumber the disgruntled. Such is the usual balance of things in most schools.

Nonetheless, I fully believe that a teacher who has unresolved issues with a school, be those issues unresolved because the teacher has not taken appropriate steps to resolve them or has not felt that the school's working environment supports such resolution, should be allowed to express those issues to other teachers who may find themselves similarly affected.

If a school feels that a review warrants investigation or removal (i.e. fabricated like Mr Evans' or otherwise posted with malicious intent), then it is very easy to contact me. Where a school sees fit to take matters into its own hands in order to 'redress the balance', I will publicise that school's activities in accordance with the Terms of Use.

VisaRus is here for many reasons, one of which is to provide teachers with information about schools and to protect them from bad employers. I take matters of bullying, harassment and intimidation very seriously and I ask that school owners and directors do likewise. No teacher should be expected to work in an environment where he or she is made to feel uncomfortable.

Just as Language Studio expects its teachers to resolve issues with senior members of staff before publicising them, I expect schools to resolve review/rating issues with me and not to take 'retaliatory' action, either by way of attempting to manipulate ratings or by way of repercussions against teachers who have shared negative experiences with the community.

I expect schools to treat teachers with fairness and equality, regardless of their relationship to the school - contract or no contract, long-serving or newcomer. Any other treatment of teachers is unacceptable and will lead to a bad reputation.

I do support Mr Wilson-Fish's point that teachers ought to attempt to resolve issues with school administration, but I also recognise that in Russian schools many teachers may not feel that they have this option.

Mr Evans' conduct has been despicable and contemptible to say the least, and by no means befitting of a senior employee of a school that is trying to present a 'high end' image. The fact he did not come to me to have the 'review' he was responding to investigated raises a number of questions.


___________________________________________________
I demand a shrubbery.
reply | quote | send private message | report abuse
  Page 1

Add to: del.icio.us   digg   furl   magnolia   reddit   spurl   spurl   Y!

Random Quote by Pirates of the Caribbean The Curse of the Black Pearl
"Jacoby I'm gonna teach you the meaning of pain. Elizabeth You like pain Try wearing a corset."

RSS random quotes for your site